Cypress vs Selenium vs Playwright: Which Test Automation Tool Should You Choose in 2025?

  • Apr 11, 2025
  • Software Automation
  • Selenium vs Cypress vs Playwright
  • 5 min
  • 92 Views

Supported Scripting Language 


Selenium:  Java , Python, JavaScript (Node.js), C#, Ruby, Kotlin

Cypress: JavaScript& TypeScript 

Playwright: JavaScript& TypeScript , Python, java, C#(.NET)


Browser supports: 

Selenium:

  • Chrome  Firefox  Safari  Edge  Internet Explorer (legacy support)  Opera (via WebDriver) Mobile browsers via Appium (Android & iOS)

Headless Mode: Supported via browser capabilities (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc.)

Cypress:

  • Chrome & Chromium-based (Edge, Brave) Firefox Electron  ✅ Web Kit 

No native support for Safari or Internet ExplorerNo mobile browser testing

Headless Mode: Supported with Chrome, Firefox, Electron


Playwright:

  • Chromium (Chrome, Edge, etc.) Firefox ✅ Web Kit (Safari engine)   Mobile Emulation: Supports emulation of devices like iPhone, Pixel, etc.

Headless Mode: Fully supported for all

No real device testing (for that you'd need integration with something like Browser Stack or Appium)

🌟 Unique strength: Playwright supports true automation of Web Kit, making it one of the only tools that can test Safari on macOS or iOS simulators without using a Mac.



Parallel Execution:

 Selenium:  Support: ✅ Yes — but handled manually or via your test runner/tooling, such as: JUnit/TestNG (Java)

 Cypress: CI Parallelization: ✅ Supported via Cypress Dashboard (paid)

 Playwright: Built-in parallel execution support via: Test runner: Playwright Test (built-in) supports using parallel workers

Cross browser testing support:

 Selenium:  Support: ✅ Yes using selenium grid

 Cypress: ✅ Built in Support

 Playwright: ✅ Built in Support


Waiting Mechanisms:

 Selenium:  Implicit , Explicit & Fluent wait mechanism 

 Cypress:  Built in Wait mechanism

 Playwright: ✅ Built in Await mechanism 


Execution speed:

 Selenium:  Comparatively slow 

 Cypress: Faster than selenium

 Playwright: Faster than cypress


Headless execution :

 Selenium:  Requires headless mode configuration

 Cypress:  Built in support

 Playwright: Built in support


CI/CD native integration:

Selenium:  This required manual intervention

 Cypress: Easily can be done from dashboard using GitLab

 Playwright:  Built in support


💡 Final Recommendation:

  • New projects? ➝ Go with Playwright — modern, powerful, and flexible.

  • JavaScript frontend-focused teams?Cypress for ease and speed.

  • Legacy systems or wide browser/device testing? Selenium is still king.

Share: