Cypress vs Selenium vs Playwright: Which Test Automation Tool Should You Choose in 2025?
- Apr 11, 2025
- Software Automation
- Selenium vs Cypress vs Playwright
- 5 min
- 92 Views
Supported Scripting Language
Selenium: Java , Python, JavaScript (Node.js), C#, Ruby, Kotlin
Selenium: Java , Python, JavaScript (Node.js), C#, Ruby, Kotlin
Cypress: JavaScript& TypeScript
Playwright: JavaScript& TypeScript , Python, java, C#(.NET)
Browser supports:
Selenium:
-
✅ Chrome ✅ Firefox ✅ Safari ✅ Edge ✅ Internet Explorer (legacy support) ✅ Opera (via WebDriver) ✅ Mobile browsers via Appium (Android & iOS)
Headless Mode: Supported via browser capabilities (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc.)
Cypress:
✅ Chrome & Chromium-based (Edge, Brave) ✅ Firefox ✅ Electron ✅ Web Kit
❌ No native support for Safari or Internet Explorer ❌ No mobile browser testing
Headless Mode: Supported with Chrome, Firefox, Electron
Playwright:
✅ Chromium (Chrome, Edge, etc.) ✅ Firefox ✅ Web Kit (Safari engine) ✅ Mobile Emulation: Supports emulation of devices like iPhone, Pixel, etc.
Headless Mode: Fully supported for all
❌ No real device testing (for that you'd need integration with something like Browser Stack or Appium)
🌟 Unique strength: Playwright supports true automation of Web Kit, making it one of the only tools that can test Safari on macOS or iOS simulators without using a Mac.
Parallel Execution:
Selenium: Support: ✅ Yes — but handled manually or via your test runner/tooling, such as: JUnit/TestNG (Java)
Cypress: CI Parallelization: ✅ Supported via Cypress Dashboard (paid)
Playwright: Built-in parallel execution support via: Test runner: Playwright Test (built-in) supports using parallel workers
Cross browser testing support:
Selenium: Support: ✅ Yes using selenium grid
Cypress: ✅ Built in Support
Playwright: ✅ Built in Support
Waiting Mechanisms:
Selenium: Implicit , Explicit & Fluent wait mechanism
Cypress: ✅ Built in Wait mechanism
Playwright: ✅ Built in Await mechanism
Execution speed:
Selenium: Comparatively slow
Cypress: Faster than selenium
Playwright: Faster than cypress
Headless execution :
Selenium: Requires headless mode configuration
Cypress: ✅ Built in support
Playwright: ✅ Built in support
CI/CD native integration:
Selenium: This required manual intervention
Cypress: Easily can be done from dashboard using GitLab
Playwright: ✅ Built in support
💡 Final Recommendation:
-
New projects? ➝ Go with Playwright — modern, powerful, and flexible.
-
JavaScript frontend-focused teams? ➝ Cypress for ease and speed.
-
Legacy systems or wide browser/device testing? ➝ Selenium is still king.
New projects? ➝ Go with Playwright — modern, powerful, and flexible.
JavaScript frontend-focused teams? ➝ Cypress for ease and speed.
Legacy systems or wide browser/device testing? ➝ Selenium is still king.